US Supreme Court Review Of Bilski
The US Supreme Court currently is considering In re Bilski, a case that could lead to a pivotal decision on patenting of business methods. Below is ever-growing list of articles on the case appearing in Intellectual Property Watch, as well as a non-exhaustive list of briefs filed by interested parties.
IPW Coverage, 2010
USPTO Seeks Comments On Post-Bilski Guidelines
28 July USPTO Seeks Comments On Post-Bilski Guidelines
29 June In Bilski Decision, US Supreme Court Adopts Tough But Vague Test for Business Method Patents
12 February Year Ahead: Reforming Global IP Systems – Trends In A2K In 2010
11 January Year Ahead: Five Key IP Cases To Watch In The United States In 2010
IPW Coverage, 2009
14 December US Government, Industry De-Emphasise Multilateral System In Enforcement Push
24 November
Bilski Decision Likely To Narrow Patentable Subject Matter In US, Panel Says
29 October
Bilski Impact On Biotech Seen As Minimal; Experts See Court Shift
23 October
US Federal Circuit May Offer Patent, Tech Policy Guidance For High Court
16 October
Inside Views: How The “Machine-Or-Transformation” Test In Bilski Is Failing
19 August
IP Burble: Law Professors Debate Bilski
31 July
Special Report: US Supreme Court Review Of Bilski Could Reverberate Through Patent System
31 July
Financial Services, Patent Experts Seek More Certainty On Business-Method Patents, Bilski Case
3 June
IP Burble: US Supreme Court To Rule On Business Method Patents
30 January
Year Ahead: IP Owners Face Tough Legal Issues In United States In 2009
IPW Coverage, 2008
6 November
Bilski Ruling Moves US Closer To Global Norms For Patenting
15 May
High US Court Reconsiders Policy Of Patenting Business Methods
From the Blogs …
The blogosphere has also closely tracked developments in the Bilski case. Here is a growing list of commentary that Intellectual Property Watch has come across:
… from Groklaw:
All Groklaw Bilski coverage
… from Holman’s Biotech IP Blog:
27 August: A Review of Some of the Amici Briefs Filed in Bilski
… from Patent Baristas:
11 November: Poll: What’s Your Favorite Quote from Bilski?
10 November: Supreme Court Ponders Hypotheticals In Bilski
16 September: Patented Methods Can Include Mental Steps
… from PatentlyO:
17 November: Patent on Tax Refund System Deemed Invalid under Section 101
10 August: Bilski Briefs
1 July: Bilski v. Doll: Reconsidering Patentable Subject Matter
Amicus Briefs
American Bar Association list of briefs for the case is here.
Biotechnology Industry Organization
Computer & Communications Industry Association
Knowledge Ecology International
Print This Page


A recent US court decision introduces entirely new questions about the balance between a transformative work and a copyright infringement. It also places the responsibility of balancing the public interest in freedom of expression against the interests of rights holders squarely in the hands of the court, writes Leslee Friedman.
Brazil is actively engaged in a cutting-edge debate over reform of its copyright law, involving issues such as the abuse of copyright holders and constructive exceptions in the law (like copying for education and/or transformative purposes and authorisation to copy by libraries and museums to preserve their works). But the government needs to hear from all interested parties – especially the artists – and avoid letting the debate transform into a political-ideological discussion, writes Brazilian lawyer Manuela Correia Botelho Colombo.